Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Changes in Ocabot - nobump will be now requiredby
Camptocamp SA, Simone Orsi
Thanks Sylvain for the wrap up and big thanks to everyone involved!
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 10:36 AM Sylvain LE GAL <email@example.com> wrote:
Hi all,We recently worked with Stephane Bidoul from Acsone, to improve the OCA bot that makes a lot of automated tasks on github. (https://github.com/OCA/oca-github-bot/)FIY, the merge command syntax will change (PR). Previously, it was possible to say \ocabot merge. It will be now mandatory to mention the bump method to apply, among these 4 options : major, minor, patch, or nobump.The nobump option should be used in rare cases. Most of the time, please follow the OCA conventions, regarding version numbers, available here.Remark : if the command is incorrect, the bot will now answer that the command was wrong. Sample.Another changes are available for the OCA bot :* Possibility to automatically update history.rst file, using oca-towncrier and fragments files (PR). If you're interested in such a feature, please take a look at that new OCA command, available in maintainer-tools project.Note 1 : There are also pending works to have the possibility to rebase the current pull request (PR) or to (auto) squash the commit of a PR. Feel free to contribute !Note 2 : For people that have installed a custom ocabot for their custom repositories, new settings are available.* Possibility to have approvals required configurable. (PR)* Possibility to add options, calling oca-gen-addons-table, oca-gen-addon-readme, oca-gen-addon-icon (PR)Kind regards.