Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
by
Numérigraphe, Lionel Sausin
Le 18/03/2016 01:53, Eric Caudal a écrit : > > Ideally we should have a +1 specific for "official reviewers" > Oh no, I think we do want reviews from everyone. We already have too few reviewers, if they have to be "official" we'll fossilize the review team. I'm OK for keeping the approvals in the comments, but with the new reactions system the "+1" is not a good mark anymore - too confusing. Can't we just write "Ok to merge"?
Reference
-
Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 11/03/2016 10:13:21 - 0-
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 22/03/2016 09:28:11 - 0 -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byMoaHub, Graeme Gellatly -
Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
byVauxoo, Moisés López Calderón -
Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
byNumérigraphe, Lionel Sausin -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byAcsone SA/NV, Laurent Mignon -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byElico Corp, Eric Caudal -
external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp France SAS, Alexandre Fayolle