Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Confusion about branch 9.0 in githubby
don't worry we are on the same page, I was just making fun.
If people prefer let people "use" version 9.0, that's fine for me.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Leonardo Pistone <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Ok Raphaël, reading again what I said, it does sound ridiculous :) I am not saying odoo/odoo 9.0 is bugless today. It isn't of course, and accounting specifically got funny (see Frederic Clementi's discussion on the new OCA accounting mailing list for details). My point was more against Landis Arnold's proposal of a 9.0-DEV branch for OCA modules. For OCA modules we have for 9.0 the same (relatively high) standards we had for 8.0, and the modules that are gradually being merged into the 9.0 *OCA* branches are as stable as the ones for 8.0. They are fewer because Odoo 9.0 is recent and work has just started. This is not a reason to "hide" them for fear of putting off people IMO. It is the nature of things. We can of course always improve docs and readmes to give all the information to newcomers. On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Raphaël Valyi <email@example.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Leonardo Pistone <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >> There is one stable version of odoo, and that is 9.0. > That last one made my day ;-)