Contributors mailing list archives

contributors@odoo-community.org

Re: Confusion about branch 9.0 in github

by
Camptocamp France SAS, Alexandre Fayolle
- 13/11/2015 12:36:19
I tend to share St├ęphane's opinion here.

Alexandre

On 13/11/2015 12:53, Bidoul@pad.odoo-community.org wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Reis <dgreis@sapo.pt
> <mailto:dgreis@sapo.pt>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     I used quotes, since I actually mean OCA "end users":
>     developers/consultants using OCA code.
> 
> 
> Ok. Then as one of those people using code, I prefer to see all modules
> (ported AND unported) at once in the README.
> If the unported modules were not in the 9.0 branch, I would need to dig
> in previous branches to discover what was there before and is just a
> port away.
> And I have seen situations were people did not do that archeology
> exercise and independently reinvented modules that where in previous
> versions.
> 
> That's why I continue to think giving adequate visibility to unported
> modules outweights the disadvantages mentioned in this thread.
> 
> So I favor the status quo plus a clear explanation
> in https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/blob/master/tools/gen_addons_table.py#L68,
> including a link to Pedro's procedure for porting.
> 
> -sbi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
> Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
> Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
> 


-- 
Alexandre Fayolle
Chef de Projet
Tel : +33 4 58 48 20 30

Camptocamp France SAS
Savoie Technolac, BP 352
73377 Le Bourget du Lac Cedex
http://www.camptocamp.com