1. Mailing Lists
  2. Contributors
  3. Re: The future of oca/bank-payment

Contributors mailing list archives

contributors@odoo-community.org

Browse archives

Re: The future of oca/bank-payment

RE: The future of oca/bank-payment

Avatar

Re: The future of oca/bank-payment

by
Tecnativa. S. L., Pedro M. Baeza
- 26/03/2025 12:23:08
I have expressed my rejection specifically on this new approach due to a lot of reasons:

- It's complicating everything, not easing it.
- It requires a lot of effort to adapt to it. Both users and developers need to change all they know.
- There's no need for this change.
- It's not bringing any value.

I have exposed all the detailed reasons on the PRs with no answer from anybody.

But it's not only that. It's the continuous contempt of Alexis refusing to follow the general OCA guidelines that we all agreed:

- One PR per module migration.
- Split changes by batches for being reviewable and debatable.
- Not clear commit history.
- Etc.

And I personally have pinged him tens of times for checking fixes or improvements in this set of modules with 0 answers. He disappears during a year and a half, and then comes with a pull request that is changing 108 files at the same time, with breaking changes, and trying to impose to the rest these non agreed changes. I don't think it's fair, even if he is able to do good code.

If you want to go this way, you should start a new module set, with different names, but leave the current ones unaltered. We are superseding this week the existing migrations on the current approach to finish them and getting them merged, as several top contributors companies like ForgeFlow, Dixmit and Tecnativa need them already.

Regards.

Reference