- Mailing Lists
- web
- Re: [OCA/web] [12.0][MIG] web_widget_digitized_signature (#1325)
web mailing list archives
web@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
- By thread
-
By date
- October 2024 2
- September 2024 5
- August 2024 1
- July 2024 1
- June 2024 2
- May 2024 7
- April 2024 4
- March 2024 3
- February 2024 2
- January 2024 1
- November 2023 3
- September 2023 5
- August 2023 4
- July 2023 3
- June 2023 1
- April 2023 1
- March 2023 7
- January 2023 2
- December 2022 1
- November 2022 3
- June 2022 2
- May 2022 2
- March 2022 1
- February 2022 2
- December 2021 1
- November 2021 8
- October 2021 2
- September 2021 1
- August 2021 12
- July 2021 9
- June 2021 8
- May 2021 20
- April 2021 31
- March 2021 7
- February 2021 1
- January 2021 6
- December 2020 12
- November 2020 29
- October 2020 5
- August 2020 1
- July 2020 28
- June 2020 14
- May 2020 7
- April 2020 10
- February 2020 9
- January 2020 5
- November 2019 1
- September 2019 2
- July 2019 5
- March 2019 4
- December 2018 6
- October 2018 38
- September 2018 20
- August 2018 19
- April 2018 1
- March 2018 1
- January 2018 1
- December 2017 1
- August 2017 1
- April 2017 1
- December 2016 2
- October 2016 1
- September 2016 1
Re: [OCA/web] [12.0][MIG] web_widget_digitized_signature (#1325)
Re: [OCA/web] [12.0][MIG] web_widget_digitized_signature (#1325)
Re: [OCA/web] [12.0][MIG] web_widget_digitized_signature (#1325)
by Maxime Chambreuil <notifications@github.com> - 18/07/2019 15:34:06Hi @rafaelbn,
The changes I pushed are cosmetic changes to facilitate code readibility and have consistency:
- Having double quote and single quote in the same manifest doesn't make sense to me.
- Having XML file with 120+ characters line either.
I don't see the point of doing separate pull requests of the same module for that and asking people to review this separately. Let's not waste everyone else time on this. Especially when we ask people later to squash commits...
Also this is a Tecnativa module that we decided to maintain, so give me a break. If you wanted to take care of it and maintain it, you had plenty of time to provide an alternative maintainer.
I think we discussed it long enough last year, this kind of behavior is negative for the community. We should welcome contributions and improve them, not reject them.
—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.