Contributors mailing list archives

contributors@odoo-community.org

Avatar

Re: Renaming OCA/project-service to OCA/vertical-service

by
Elico Corp, Eric Caudal
- 30/08/2015 03:51:13
+1
One procedure only


Sent from my Samsung device


-------- Original message --------
From: Maxime Chambreuil <maxime.chambreuil@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date: 2015/08/30 03:22 (GMT+08:00)
To: OCA Contributors <contributors@odoo-community.org>
Subject: Re: Renaming OCA/project-service to OCA/vertical-service

+1
--
Maxime Chambreuil
+1 (514) 276-5468 #126

----- Le 29 Aoû 15, à 12:38, <Pedro@pad.odoo-community.org> a écrit :

For me it's clear: they should all pass through a review process in a per module basis to assure OCA guidelines are applied from the beginning.

Regards.

2015-08-29 17:52 GMT+02:00 Daniel Reis <dgreis@sapo.pt>:
One last question regarding the how:

Should we accept a bulk unreviewed merge and do thorough reviews when porting to v9 (like what happened to hr), or go through a module by module review as usual?

--DR

No dia 29/08/2015, às 16:22, Pedro@pad.odoo-community.org escreveu:

OK, let's go for this approach.

Regards.

2015-08-29 16:53 GMT+02:00 Eric Caudal <eric.caudal@elico-corp.com>:

Sounds reasonable to me too

--
Eric Caudal [Founder and CEO]
Skype: elico.corp. Phone: + 86 186 2136 1670 (Cell), + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37 (Office)
Elico Shanghai (Shenzhen/Singapore) Odoo Gold Partner, best Odoo Partner 2014 for APAC
On 08/29/2015 10:08 PM, Maxime Chambreuil wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:1039147872.755160.1440856526183.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com" type="cite">
I agree with this proposal.

--
Maxime Chambreuil
+1 (514) 276-5468 #126

----- Le 29 Aoû 15, à 9:22, Daniel Reis <dgreis@sapo.pt> a écrit :

> Daniel, we have done this move because there's a proposal for
> including a bunch of contract-related modules. In concrete, these
> ones: https://github.com/Domatix/maintenance-contract, so please redo
> again your proposal so we can achieve an agreement.
>
Thank you for sharing the proposal Pedro.
These modules look like a nice addition.

They extend Odoo Contracts without using Project features, going as far
as to create Work Orders without reusing Project Tasks.
It's a possible approach with it's own merits, and is not incompatible
with the Project task approach.

In my opinion the existing "OCA/contract" is the best fit and should be
reactivated to host them.
The Project related modules should stay in the "OCA/project" repository.
Both repos should be coordinated by the same PSC.


--Daniel



_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/oca-contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe


_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/oca-contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe


_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/oca-contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe


_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/oca-contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

Follow-Ups