Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Migration to version 9by
Thanks for the initiative ! I'm also in favor of deleting the __unported__ folder. But -1 for using git filter-branch and moving each module (a clean git history matter).
Thanks for this proposal! I strongly agree with the removal of __unported__. But I'm -1 for the migration per module using filter-branch for the same reason that Stéphane and for another very reason: it does not support the renaming of a module so the history would stop at the first git mv. -- Guewen Baconnier On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:23 PM, <Bidoul@pad.odoo-community.org> wrote: > Another big con is that the forward port process by a git merge of 8.0 into > 9.0 is not possible. > > I'll think to it a little bit more but I'd say at this stage I'm not a huge > fan of this method. I believe the disadvantages outweight the small benefit > of hiding unported modules. > > At some point there was a proposal of > - keeping unported modules with active=False > - having an (autogenerated) list of modules and their status in the > README.md of the repository > > That proposal plus an systematic forward port process is my favorite > approach at this point. > > -sbi > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 7:52 PM, <Pedro@pad.odoo-community.org> wrote: >> >> Pros of this method: >> >> Avoid a lot of commits starting the branch. >> Avoid commits of deprecated modules. >> Avoid having outdated version that was put on __unported__ when release >> version was out, but later modified on the previous version. >> Avoid forgetting to use the version in __unported__. >> No misunderstanding for newcomers about the existence of the module in the >> __unported__ folder. >> No need to remove any module. >> >> Cons of this method: >> >> It requires a process to start a PR a bit more complicated than before. >> Reviewers should check if the commit history is well-extracted. >> Contribution statistics are disturbed by this process (although it can be >> easily filtered by distinct commits). >> >> So we think the number of pros is better than the cons, and that's why we >> propose this. >> >> Please comment any possible thing we haven't figure out. >> >> Regards. >> >> >> >> 2015-08-26 19:23 GMT+02:00 Maxime Chambreuil >> <firstname.lastname@example.org>: >>> >>> Dear OCA contributors >>> >>> Pedro and I proposed a new process to manage the coming migration from 8 >>> to 9 : >>> >>> https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Migration-to-version-9-%28WIP%29>>> >>> Main thing is to get rid of the __unported__ directory as it contains >>> outdated versions of modules. We want to migrate the latest version and >>> avoid duplicating PR against many branches. >>> >>> Version 9 is still more than a month ahead, so we have time to review, >>> discuss and agree on this proposal. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> -- >>> Maxime Chambreuil >>> +1 (514) 276-5468 #126 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/oca-contributors-15 >>> Post to: mailto:email@example.com >>> Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/oca-contributors-15 >> Post to: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org >> Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/oca-contributors-15 > Post to: mailto:email@example.com > Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
Post to: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org