Contributors mailing list archives
Re: enhanced wikipedia pageby
This is something that we need to fix at board level with better coordinated PR actions.
We have hired a new General Secretary (Rebecca Gellatly) to help the board in the daily tasks and this might be a good opportunity to start spreading the good word.
We should write articles (as neutral as possible) that we should propose to Internet magazines.
I do not want to hijack roles (Daniel Reis and Dave Lasley are responsible of marketing and Communication) but it wouldnot hurt if some volunteers could write general presentation (like the one for Wikipedia) or dedicated article and others to list potential general magazines or expert reviews where we could post them.
It will take probably a year or 2 before we get a "reputation" on the Internet so that we can safely post on Wikipedia.
Eric Caudal [Founder and CEO]
Skype: elico.corp. Phone: + 86 186 2136 1670 (Cell), + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37 (Office)
Elico Shanghai (Hong Kong/Shenzhen/Singapore)
Odoo Gold Partner // Best Odoo Partner APAC 2014 and 2016
There seem to be really few sources available, so that's an issue.I do think we can refer to newspaper articles in other languages though - so maybe there has been some coverage in Belgian, French, Spanish or Dutch newspapers?Also perhaps we can refer to the Odoo books, if OCA is mentioned in them. Books are reputable sources of information.TomOn Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Xavier Brochard <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:The draft was rejected again by Wikipedia (Tom's improvement were not yet on wikipedia). The main reason is notability and reference. The reviewer left me this additional comment : "References to blogs and niche online sources do not constitute widespread media coverage." So we need better references. I have some from CNET and ZDNET but in french only. Xavier Le mercredi 10 janvier 2018, 22:56:33 CET Tom Blauwendraat a écrit : > Yes i left out the references, but i think if we mix my text with your > references we can be a long way. Lets wait for comments from other > contributors. > > Op 10 jan. 2018 9:55 PM schreef "Xavier Brochard" <email@example.com>: > > Your version is very good, far better than mine. > > > > 2 things : > > I would extend OCB explanations but it can be done later. > > Don't forget to keep some references that are outside OCA (they are > > required).