Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Request for new project oca/queueby
Akretion France, David BEAL
Le 10 oct. 2016 18:08, "Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa)" <firstname.lastname@example.org> a écrit :
OK, let's go for that way then!Regards.2016-10-10 17:38 GMT+02:00 Guewen Baconnier <guewen.baconnier@camptocamp.
com>:> wrote: >>> ... >>> > >>> > However, what could be done is that OCA connector team should still be >>> > in >>> > charge of both repository as for now I don't think there would be >>> > enough >>> > people for 2 teams, maybe I'm wrong. >>> > >>> >>> Yes! That's indeed the idea. >>> >>> >>> ______________________________Fully agree, perhaps it's easier to feel responsible of a small repository with a very well known code base for a team of maintainers than for many addons in a repository, most of them unknown. Pedro, I was speaking about 'base_import_async' because it has no functional dependencies and I bet other addons like this will arise. On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Stéphane Bidoul <email@example.com> wrote: > +1 for a new small repo with the job queue only. Modules exploiting the > queue in different functional domains can remain in their respective repos. > > I'm not afraid of having more smaller repositories with more focused groups > of maintainers each. I'm convinced it will make the community more > efficient. > > Best regards, > > -sbi > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 5:08 PM Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa) > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >> >> I have 2 fears with this: >> >> - We still continue adding more and more repos. >> - Concepts get very transversal now. For example, we have >> https://github.com/OCA/bank-pa yment/tree/8.0/account_payment>> that uses "queue" for reconciling payment order lines, but having this new >> repo and moving to it makes to hardly follow the existence of this >> batch/queue option. >> >> Thus, I still prefer to have one repository for both, and hosts possible >> parallel implementations suffixed with _queue on each of the corresponding >> repositories of the functional area. >> >> What do you think about this? >> >> Regards. >> >> 2016-10-10 15:38 GMT+02:00 Guewen Baconnier >> <email@example.com _transfer_reconcile_batch om>: >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Yannick Vaucher >>> <firstname.lastname@example.org m _________________ >>> Mailing-List: >>> http://odoo-community.org/grou ps/contributors-15>>> Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-commu nity.org>>> Unsubscribe: >>> http://odoo-community.org/grou ps?unsubscribe>>> >>> >> >> ______________________________ _________________ >> Mailing-List: >> http://odoo-community.org/grou ps/contributors-15>> Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-commu nity.org>> Unsubscribe: >> http://odoo-community.org/grou ps?unsubscribe>> >> >> > ______________________________ _________________ > Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/grou ps/contributors-15> Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-commu nity.org> Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/grou ps?unsubscribe