Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
by
Therp, Ronald Portier
+1 Completely agree with Stefan. Op 14-09-16 om 12:23 schreef Stefan Rijnhart: > On 14-09-16 00:38, Eric Caudal wrote: >> >> AGPL and LGPL are to fairly open source licenses AFAIR ;) so we would >> not slipping into the "proprietary" world yet >> > > Well, a module licensed under LGPL allows a proprietary module to be > built on top of it. It gives these proprietary modules a distinct > competitive advantage over their open source dependencies and lowers the > return on investment in these open source contributions, which is why I > strongly prefer the AGPL for OCA modules. > > Regards, > Stefan. > > -- > Opener B.V. - Business solutions driven by open source collaboration > > Stefan Rijnhart - Consultant/developer > > mail: stefan@opener.am > tel: +31 (0) 20 3090 139 > web: https://opener.am > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15 > Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org > Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe >
Reference
-
Licence of version 9.0 modules
bySavoir-faire Linux, David Dufresne-
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
byClosingAp Open Source Integrators Europe, LDA, Daniel Reis -
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
by Jairo Llopis <jairo.llopis@tecnativa.com> - 16/09/2016 09:27:27 - 0 -
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
by Jairo Llopis <jairo.llopis@tecnativa.com> - 16/09/2016 09:17:04 - 0 -
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
byClosingAp Open Source Integrators Europe, LDA, Daniel Reis