Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Alternative 8.0-9.0 migration procedureby
Acsone SA/NV, Stéphane Bidoul
Thanks for the feedback Pedro.
By the way I have not tested it but I think it works also if the module being migrated does not yet exist on the 9.0 branch.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:23 AM Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa) <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I have tried your procedure, Stephane, and it works very well, so for me we can switch the current procedure (I wrote it) with yours. I have only added one step to ensure 8.0 branch exists before making the rest of the steps.Regards.2016-09-12 16:53 GMT+02:00 Jairo Llopis <email@example.com>:I recently experienced difficulties with the usual migration procedure.I got a similar problem for updating the website_slides backport (so it's not exactly the "usual" procedure).Here's my solution, although it is in Spanish (I bet you know how to use Google Translator ;)Indeed the process needs some polishing. Filtering by date may work most times, but sometimes the merge takes place after that date, but the commit you are merging took place before, so it would get excluded.