Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 22/03/2016 09:28:112016-03-18 10:38 GMT+01:00 Mignon, Laurent <laurent.mignon@acsone.eu>:
Be careful. Even if an other tool may help to ease the review process it's also a new barrier to attract new contributors.
I agree with you. These seem tools that simplify what already is quite simple (writing :+1:), so I'd rather stick with GH for now.
Reference
-
Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 11/03/2016 10:13:21 - 0-
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 22/03/2016 09:28:11 - 0 -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byMoaHub, Graeme Gellatly -
Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
byVauxoo, Moisés López Calderón -
Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
byNumérigraphe, Lionel Sausin -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byAcsone SA/NV, Laurent Mignon -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byElico Corp, Eric Caudal -
external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp France SAS, Alexandre Fayolle