Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Comparison of OCA modules bom_stock and stock_available_mrpby
Camptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume
Thanks for the work ! +1 for merging both in stock_available_mrp.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Alexandre Fayolle <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 15/03/2016 10:52, Cyril Gaudin - Camptocamp wrote: > Hello community, > > > First of all a little presentation about myself as it's my first message > on this mailing list. > My name is Cyril Gaudin, I’m a new Odoo developer at Camptocamp in > France and I’m glad to be a new OCA contributor. > > For my current project, we need a module that computes the quantity of a > product that can be manufactured with the components immediately at hand > (based on BOM). > > After looking in OCA, we found two modules: > > * stock_available_mrp: > https://github.com/OCA/stock-logistics-warehouse/tree/8.0/stock_available_mrp > > * bom_stock : > https://github.com/OCA/product-kitting/tree/8.0/bom_stock (With V8 > migration PR waiting to be merge: > https://github.com/OCA/product-kitting/pull/11) > > > Here is my evaluation of these modules: > > stock_available_mrp (stock-logistics-warehouse) : > > * Compute BOM quantity and add this quantity to "Available to promise" > (from stock_available > > module) > * Displayed in list and form views, therefore they may be performances > issues with complex BOM. > * Multiple units on a same components is not managed. > * Recursive BOM management. > * No manufacturing delays management. > > > bom_stock (product-kitting): > > * Compute BOM quantity, which is displayed in Inventory tab on product > page (no performance issue) > * This quantity can be based on real / virtual / immediately available > component quantity (can be changed in company settings) > * Multiple units management > * No recursive BOM management > * No manufacturing delays management. > > > So both modules should be corrected (multiple units management and > recursive BOM should work). > > We need this feature for an Odoo V9 , which module should we migrate > (and revise)? Thanks Cyril, I think we want to keep only one of these in v9, ideally merging the nice features of both. I'd go with stock_available_mrp, with a fix for the unit management. In any case the fix for unit management is due for 8.0 of this project. -- Alexandre Fayolle Chef de Projet Tel : +33 4 58 48 20 30 Camptocamp France SAS Savoie Technolac, BP 352 73377 Le Bourget du Lac Cedex http://www.camptocamp.com
Camptocamp France SAS, Cyril Gaudin