Contributors mailing list archives

contributors@odoo-community.org

Browse archives

Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?

Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?

Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?

by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 15/03/2016 11:20:25

2016-03-13 10:53 GMT+01:00 Holger Brunn <hbrunn@therp.nl>:

sure we should. Did anyone figure out what we need to feed into a link to only show >=3 PRs?

Sorry, I don't understand you.

Reference

Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 11/03/2016 10:13:21 - 0
21 replies 21 replies
- Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
  by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 22/03/2016 09:37:41 - 0
- Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
  by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 22/03/2016 09:28:11 - 0
- Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
  by
  
  Camptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume
  
  - 21/03/2016 10:25:19 - 0
- Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
  by
  
  MoaHub, Graeme Gellatly
  
  - 18/03/2016 18:56:10 - 0
- Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
  by
  
  Vauxoo, Moisés López Calderón
  
  - 18/03/2016 15:01:20 - 0
- Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
  by
  
  Numérigraphe, Lionel Sausin
  
  - 18/03/2016 12:05:47 - 0
- Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
  by
  
  Camptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume
  
  - 18/03/2016 11:32:08 - 0
- Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
  by
  
  Acsone SA/NV, Laurent Mignon
  
  - 18/03/2016 10:28:09 - 0
- Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
  by
  
  Elico Corp, Eric Caudal
  
  - 18/03/2016 09:56:42 - 0
- external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
  by
  
  Camptocamp France SAS, Alexandre Fayolle
  
  - 18/03/2016 09:21:45 - 0