Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Proposal to add Operating Units to OCAby
Eficent Business and IT Consulting Services, S.L., Jordi Ballester Alomar
It's running in 7.0.
Since we must migrate to new API, that's where I suggest that we move to 9.0 directly, and then go backwards.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Houssine BAKKALI <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
my opinion would be to propose it first on the version on which the module are actually running. I guess it's for 8.0. And migrate the code to 9.0 to backport it to 8.0 is double work if it's curently running on 8.0my two cents2015-12-07 12:23 GMT+01:00 Jordi Ballester Alomar <email@example.com>:Thanks!We're thinking of the following strategy to move the modules to OCA:1. One module at a time2. Push to 9.0, if the dependent modules are already in 9.0. The reason is that 9.0 is now the main branch, and as this is a new feature, it can help better promote the use of the new version.3. Once merge to 9.0 is completed, backport to 8.0 and 7.0Please let me know your thoughts.Regards,Jordi.On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:38 AM, <Bidoul@pad.odoo-community.org> wrote:Hello Jordi,The 3 branches are initialized with a basic README.md. I think the rest can be done through PR.-sbiOn Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Bidoul, Stéphane <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Hi Jordi,
I'm initializing the repo.-sbiOn Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Jordi Ballester Alomar <email@example.com> wrote:
Thanks! I can see now.
Can you create branches 7.0, 8.0 and 9.0?