Contributors mailing list archives

contributors@odoo-community.org

Re: Confusion about branch 9.0 in github

by
Camptocamp SA, Guewen Baconnier
- 13/11/2015 13:02:03
+1

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:53 PM, <Bidoul@pad.odoo-community.org> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Daniel Reis <dgreis@sapo.pt> wrote:

I used quotes, since I actually mean OCA "end users": developers/consultants using OCA code.

Ok. Then as one of those people using code, I prefer to see all modules (ported AND unported) at once in the README.
If the unported modules were not in the 9.0 branch, I would need to dig in previous branches to discover what was there before and is just a port away.
And I have seen situations were people did not do that archeology exercise and independently reinvented modules that where in previous versions.

That's why I continue to think giving adequate visibility to unported modules outweights the disadvantages mentioned in this thread.

So I favor the status quo plus a clear explanation inĀ https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/blob/master/tools/gen_addons_table.py#L68, including a link to Pedro's procedure for porting.

-sbi