Contributors mailing list archives
Re: OCA Coding Standards and recommended IDEsby
Technical Director, XPANSA Group | ERP, BI, E-commerce, Data Mining and DMS consulting
It could be interesting to provide/share some snipet files in maintainer-tools for example: it would increase the quality of received PR.
I am not in favor of pushing one or another tool--
Eric Caudal [Founder and CEO]
Skype: elico.corp. Phone: + 86 186 2136 1670 (Cell), + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37 (Office)
Elico Shanghai (Shenzhen/Singapore) Odoo Gold Partner, best Odoo Partner 2014 for APACOn 10/16/2015 07:38 PM, Yajo wrote:<blockquote cite="mid:CAHceOEffrMQZ_Tx8BY9fTx-hKoR3-KD0HMzGCmLHGm3ZYUJakQ@mail.gmail.com" type="cite">2015-10-16 13:23 GMT+02:00 Leonardo Pistone <firstname.lastname@example.org>:I disagree: I don't think we should support / encourage specific IDEs or other tools. These are very personal choices.Same here. Please don't do it.As for tools, I agree that we'd need a simple command line wrapper that lints according to the OCA conventions. Then anyone will be able to tell their editor of choice to use it instead of i.e. "flake8".Everyone is free to use a text editor that has no flake8 support, so adding those checks you say in travis would be wiser IMHO, as it is now with flake8.
Post to: mailto:email@example.com