1. Mailing Lists
  2. Contributors
  3. Re: Guidelines for LLM generated contributions

Contributors mailing list archives

contributors@odoo-community.org

Browse archives

Re: Guidelines for LLM generated contributions

Re: Guidelines for LLM generated contributions

Avatar

Re: Guidelines for LLM generated contributions

by
MoaHub, Graeme Gellatly
- 18/09/2025 11:20:06
I actually just completed a course in ai governance and ethics. It was finance focused as requirement for being an accountant, but declaring usage of llm in generating any professional services output is the very bare minimum. Human review was a mandatory part of governance, but honestly there was like 50 things there.

E.g This PR was generated using x llm and reviewed by a human for correctness prior to submission.

Le jeu. 18 sept. 2025, 21:12, Tom Blauwendraat <notifications@odoo-community.org> a écrit :
Thinking a bit out of the box here, but what might perhaps work is if:

- We set up a separate organisation OCA-ai
- This mirrors the full OCA organization as a fork, similar to odoo vs OCB
- If something looks like AI we close and tell contributors to reopen it there (could possibly be automated with the OCA bot if we can recognize something as AI)
- In that organisation we require 100% test coverage and passing tests, as well as the standard migration process having been followed (could be automated)
- If the bot decides there that it is OK, it automatically reopens the PR to the real OCA organization (where we thus only get "prefiltered" PRs)

In the absence of such automation I +1 Stefan's suggestion of adding a guideline

_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe

Reference