1. Mailing Lists
  2. Contributors
  3. Re: The future of oca/bank-payment

Contributors mailing list archives

contributors@odoo-community.org

Browse archives

Re: The future of oca/bank-payment

Re: The future of oca/bank-payment

Avatar

Re: The future of oca/bank-payment

by
DIXMIT Consulting SLU, Enric Tobella Alomar
- 02/04/2025 06:46:37
Hi everyone,

I reviewed the video. And it doesn't change my position. I think that it is an overengineer work to do something that is more natural with the current system. I don't see the real benefits of the change, as the current system does it properly with a more direct and simple approach. I think we should end this discussion soon in order to get a solution for 18 soon. 

My proposal would be the following: Merge the modules migrated by Tecnativa. Create a separate system for your proposal (we could create a separate repo if you prefer). It might happen in the future that both systems are merged (similar to storage_backend and fs_storage... at the end, they merged, but they started splitted), but right now it doesn't seem so 

Kind regards,

El mar, 1 abr 2025 a las 18:37, Alexis de Lattre (<notifications@odoo-community.org>) escribió:
Dear community,

Le mer. 26 mars 2025 à 18:09, Alexis de Lattre <alexis.delattre@akretion.com> a écrit :
Dear Enric,

Le mer. 26 mars 2025 à 12:47, Enric Tobella Alomar <notifications@odoo-community.org> a écrit :
For example with the current system we can decide the bank to pay at the end in a simple way, no complication on that side. With this change, everything becomes more complicated, removing part of the functionality that we have and it was much better that the current Odoo behavior. Also, it implies that users will see one TRansference payment method for each journal, and that is a nonsense.

Did you test my v18 PR that adds the module account_payment_base_oca https://github.com/OCA/bank-payment/pull/1401 ?
My goal was to use the native object account.payment.method.line (used in v18 as "payment mode" on partners and invoices) while keeping the feature "decide the bank to pay at the end in a simple way". And I managed to implement it without breaking the native behavior. It was important to keep this feature !

I prepared a short screencast of my PR 1401 that illustrate the fact that my implementation keeps the feature "decide the bank to pay at the end in a simple way", like in OCA/bank-payment v9 to v17 :


So we can adopt the native object "account.payment.method.line" and keep the great features of OCA/bank-payment.
I even added a small improvement : when you configure "Link to Bank Account" to "Variable", you can select a Default Bank Journal if you want (it's optional).
 
--
Alexis de Lattre

_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: https://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: https://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe



--
Enric Tobella Alomar
CEO & Founder

Reference