Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Proposing moving Pledra product configurator to the OCAby
Sygel Technology S.L., Harald Panten Lopez
El mié, 3 mar 2021 a las 19:32, David Beal (<email@example.com>) escribió:
+1CordialementLe mer. 3 mars 2021 à 18:52, Jesús Alan Ramos Rodríguez <firstname.lastname@example.org> a écrit :+1El mié, 3 de mar. de 2021 a la(s) 11:07, Sandip Mangukiya (email@example.com) escribió:Definitely +1On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:57 AM Bruno Joliveau <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:+1Le mer. 3 mars 2021 à 11:32, Patrick Wilson <email@example.com> a écrit :+1On Wed, 3 Mar 2021, 9:27 am Yves Goldberg, <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:+1.--Yves Goldberg------- Original message -----From: Daniel Reis <email@example.com>To: Contributors <firstname.lastname@example.org>Subject: Proposing moving Pledra product configurator to the OCADate: Wednesday, March 03, 2021 18:02Hello all,Some of you may be familiar with the Pledra project, proposing an advanced product configurator.I don't think there is a comparable project in the OCA, and I would like proposing to move Pledra under the OCA umbrella.I contacted the original author, Paul Catinean, and he is supportive of this move.There are quite a few details to get right, and I'm ready to take the role and address them.At this point the main question is, from a high level PoV if this sounds like a good idea, and what concerns we should address when moving forward.Thank you, and thanks Paul for being onboard with this.
Open Source Integrators, Daniel Reis