Contributors mailing list archives


Re: Renaming OCA/project-service to OCA/vertical-service

Open Source Integrators, Daniel Reis
- 29/08/2015 17:43:04
One last question regarding the how:

Should we accept a bulk unreviewed merge and do thorough reviews when porting to v9 (like what happened to hr), or go through a module by module review as usual?


No dia 29/08/2015, às 16:22, escreveu:

OK, let's go for this approach.


2015-08-29 16:53 GMT+02:00 Eric Caudal <>:

Sounds reasonable to me too

Eric Caudal [Founder and CEO]
Skype: elico.corp. Phone: + 86 186 2136 1670 (Cell), + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37 (Office)
Elico Shanghai (Shenzhen/Singapore) Odoo Gold Partner, best Odoo Partner 2014 for APAC
On 08/29/2015 10:08 PM, Maxime Chambreuil wrote:
<blockquote cite="" type="cite">
I agree with this proposal.

Maxime Chambreuil
+1 (514) 276-5468 #126

----- Le 29 Aoû 15, à 9:22, Daniel Reis <> a écrit :

> Daniel, we have done this move because there's a proposal for
> including a bunch of contract-related modules. In concrete, these
> ones:, so please redo
> again your proposal so we can achieve an agreement.
Thank you for sharing the proposal Pedro.
These modules look like a nice addition.

They extend Odoo Contracts without using Project features, going as far
as to create Work Orders without reusing Project Tasks.
It's a possible approach with it's own merits, and is not incompatible
with the Project task approach.

In my opinion the existing "OCA/contract" is the best fit and should be
reactivated to host them.
The Project related modules should stay in the "OCA/project" repository.
Both repos should be coordinated by the same PSC.


Post to: