Contributors mailing list archives
Re: New repository request: OCA/risk-managementby
I really don't like financial risk - to me that is currency hedging, contingent liabilities, sensitivity analysis, futures, gearing etc e.g. managing and understanding the risks of financial decisions, not essentially daily operational decisions.Partner risk is OK. Given a choice between the two, I'd go partner risk.To me the modules fall under a large banner of cashflow or debtors management, in a subset of credit policy. All 3 existing seem to be about enforcing credit policy, and I imagine there are loads of other things that could fit there as well (followup management, terms of trade, againg reports, basically everything to do with managing debtor/creditor balances)On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Rafael Blasco <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
De: Eric Caudal [mailto:email@example.com]
Enviado el: sábado, 14 de abril de 2018 3:48
Para: Contributors <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Asunto: Re: New repository request: OCA/risk-management
I prefer OCA/financial-risk
Eric Caudal [Founder and CEO]
Skype: elico.corp. Phone: + 86 186 2136 1670 (Cell), + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37 (Office)
Elico Shanghai (Hong Kong/Shenzhen/Singapore)
Odoo Gold Partner // Best Odoo Partner APAC 2014 and 2016
On 04/14/2018 03:17 AM, Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa) wrote:
OK, but in that case it's better OCA/financial-risk than OCA/partner-risk, don't you think?
2018-04-13 21:02 GMT+02:00 Daniel Reis <email@example.com>:
IMO the repository name might be confusing - it may sound like it handles operations/work risk management, as one by some modules in OCA/management-system.
I suggest OCA/partner-risk for the repo name.
No dia 13/04/2018, às 19:32, Pedro M. Baeza (Tecnativa) <firstname.lastname@example.org> escreveu:
2018-04-13 20:17 GMT+02:00 Jean-Charles Drubay <email@example.com>:
Could you share some high level presentation of the modules?
I guess you have some features like average time to pay invoices since due date , total receivable, maybe some other risk kpi... Then some userExceptions when a customer crossed limits when confirming SO, or when confirming delivery orders.
If so, I agree that it should be out of partner contact repo which seems to focus on address book management.
We have currently a set of modules for managing the financial risk in customers in OCA/partner-contact, with the names partner_financial_risk_*.
We are going to migrate them to v11, and I think we should isolate them on a new repository with this name, that can host also other risk management modules.
What do you think?
Post to: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org