Contributors mailing list archives
Re: The future of OCBby
I supported OCB as a clean solution because it provided stability
I do not support OCX because I think that OCX will confuse the community:
* it is not a fork but it is a fork.
* It is not OCB but it is OCB+
* It is for experiment but some modules are gonna be created on it (so supposedly for production)
Message/objective is not clear and it will divide resources that could be better employed elsewhere.
Overall I think this is not a good idea and not in favor of it in the OCA umbrella.
NB: I am not against experimentation / R&D but this is not the main objective of the OCA and we do not have the resources to do it properly
Skype: elico.corp. Phone: + 86 186 2136 1670 (Cell), + 86 21 6211 8017/27/37 (Office)
Elico Shanghai (Hong Kong/Shenzhen/Singapore)
Odoo Gold Partner // Best Odoo Partner APAC 2014 and 2016
Post to: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org