Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modulesby
Camptocamp SA, Simone Orsi
I fully agree with Pedro and Nhomar.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Nhomar Hernandez <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:53 AM, Yannick Vaucher <email@example.com
m> wrote:We won't change AGPL to LGPL as it would be against OCA commitement.This specific statement is not true, OCA commitment is protect customer, developer and community from a lot of things Licence AGPL and LGPL depending the case can help with that.What's the point of have huge quantity of modules if they can not be used properly with enterprise version and/or what's the point to block the enterprise version to finance the product evolution? I mean we are all working hard, make religious statements without proper basements is not healthy.I think like Pedro on this matter and everybody must be free to chose a proper FOSS licence and contribute without religion commitment to OCA.Regards.