Contributors mailing list archives


Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules

Camptocamp SA, Yannick Payot
- 14/09/2016 11:41:09
You are right Lorenzo I'm against the *massive* change from AGPL to LGPL not againts the LGPL license itself.


Yannick Vaucher
Business Solutions Software Developer

Camptocamp SA
PSE A, CH-1015 Lausanne
Phone: +41 21 619 10 30
Office: +41 21 619 10 10

On 14 September 2016 at 11:38, Lorenzo Battistini <> wrote:
On 14 September 2016 at 10:53, Yannick Vaucher <> wrote:

We won't change AGPL to LGPL as it would be against OCA commitement.

I don't think LGPL is, in itself, against OCA commitment, as it is an open source license.
I think we should not and we can not mass change the license of every module. Single module can be change and it should be up to the module's authors.

I have no problems with LGPL and, also, I would like to use LGPL modules to build proprietary modules (See
I also think this would allow our ecosystem to grow.


Lorenzo Battistini
Tel (IT): +39 011 198 25481

Post to: