Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
by
Camptocamp SA, Yannick Payot
You are right Lorenzo I'm against the *massive* change from AGPL to LGPL not againts the LGPL license itself.
Cheers,Yannick Vaucher
Business Solutions Software Developer
Camptocamp SA
PSE A, CH-1015 Lausanne
Phone: +41 21 619 10 30
Office: +41 21 619 10 10
On 14 September 2016 at 11:38, Lorenzo Battistini <lorenzo.battistini@agilebg.com> wrote:
On 14 September 2016 at 10:53, Yannick Vaucher <yannick.vaucher@camptocamp.com > wrote:+1
We won't change AGPL to LGPL as it would be against OCA commitement.I don't think LGPL is, in itself, against OCA commitment, as it is an open source license.I think we should not and we can not mass change the license of every module. Single module can be change and it should be up to the module's authors.I have no problems with LGPL and, also, I would like to use LGPL modules to build proprietary modules (See https://github.com/OCA/web/issues/414#issue-174299710 ). I also think this would allow our ecosystem to grow.Regards--______________________________
_________________
Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/contributors-15
Post to: mailto:contributors@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe
Reference
-
Licence of version 9.0 modules
bySavoir-faire Linux, David Dufresne-
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
byClosingAp Open Source Integrators Europe, LDA, Daniel Reis -
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
by Jairo Llopis <jairo.llopis@tecnativa.com> - 16/09/2016 09:27:27 - 0 -
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
by Jairo Llopis <jairo.llopis@tecnativa.com> - 16/09/2016 09:17:04 - 0 -
Re: Licence of version 9.0 modules
byClosingAp Open Source Integrators Europe, LDA, Daniel Reis