Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
by
Camptocamp France SAS, Alexandre Fayolle
I'm all in favor of including the the first two checks (xml_id related) in our QA chain. I'm more doubtful about the performance checks: in my experience, performance issues show up with real data (several 1000s of lines in the tables), and rarely with only demo data. However these may be useful for others, so I'm fine with including them. It's not clear to me why these modules need to be versionned. Could you enlighten me? Thanks -- Alexandre Fayolle Chef de Projet Tel : +33 4 58 48 20 30 Camptocamp France SAS Savoie Technolac, BP 352 73377 Le Bourget du Lac Cedex http://www.camptocamp.com
Reference
-
Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
byVauxoo, Moisés López Calderón-
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
byClosingAp Open Source Integrators Europe, LDA, Daniel Reis -
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
byCamptocamp France SAS, Alexandre Fayolle -
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
byVauxoo, Moisés López Calderón -
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
byCamptocamp France SAS, Alexandre Fayolle -
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
byTecnativa. S. L., Pedro M. Baeza -
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
byVauxoo, Moisés López Calderón -
Re: Project for special dynamic checks of maintainer-quality-tools
byTecnativa. S. L., Pedro M. Baeza
-