Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Proposal for new workflow, incorporating "Optimistic Merging"by
Vauxoo, Nhomar Hernández
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Houssine BAKKALI <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
If you allows me... going for the explained OM wouldn't solve the "problem"... For the PR that still pending and that i've followed several stay pending because some reviewers are sometimes a bit too picky for change that wouldn't make any difference and that could also be a factor for contributor to give up.
A good help is mention that! it means, if some reviewer is saying something blocking which somebody else thinks it shouldn't then mention a counter +1 ponting the reason will help us.
It means we (the ones that review) sometimes give so light reviews or so deeps ones and it is useful somebody else say "I think you are wrong" that discussion are rich of knowledge also eithe reviewer learn or the contributor.
ThinkOpen Solutions Portugal, Daniel Reis