Contributors mailing list archives
Re: New Odoo Product Configurator Moduleby
We are on the same page on this one.I reiterate once more just for the record that at no point in time have I ever had the intention of competing with the OCA, members, modules or launching separate work under my name in the detriment of others.
Converging with existing work (if any and no matter how advanced) was always the plan from the start and I agreed with Pedro as I do with you that communication and timing could have been better on my part. It is just that work began before OCA or OdooMRP repository for that matter and finished a bit after. I also did not want to announce anything until I was convinced I could convert the module to a generic form. By the time I was done progress was already made on this repository, I noticed it late and did not study it too deeply either.
Regarding the cohesion of the modules by looking at the OdooMRP ones should not be difficult imo since the design of my module is non-invasive.It just adds extra logic on the product.template and product.product module that do not change the behavior in any way and is merely a set of instructions for the configurators accessing information about the product.
Though in order be sure give me some time to study it a bit better over the weekend and maybe even try to make a quick merge of the modules as a proof of concept.Also I'm thinking about setting up a online instance of my modules for people to try out first hand.
Regarding the campaign there's is nothing that cannot be undone, it's fixed funding meaning it will refund everything (I can do it manually too) and no harm done.Even though I've spent quite a bit of time, energy and finances in setting it up it doesn't matter now.
For all I care we can make a OCA campaign and derive from that or just go the route it started now. In the end I just want to reach my two goals:
1. Have the code, knowledge and help given to OCA to be shared with everyone
2. Cover the expenses derived from conversion of the module
The means by which it is reached is not that important to me.I am also open to other suggestions as well
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Levent Karakas <email@example.com> wrote: