Contributors mailing list archives
contributors@odoo-community.org
Browse archives
Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
by
Quentin THEURET
Le 11/03/2016 10:23, Yajo a écrit : > Since the actual OCA process is to get 3x👍 to merge, we could be > interested in using this officially. > > However I don't know how/if GH notifies the participants about > reactions, so maybe you still prefer the old /add a comment/ behavior > for approvals... In such case, it could be also specified in the > guidelines to avoid mistakes by casual reviewers. > > What do you think about this? > Hi, I think it could be a good alternative of comments with just +1. This avoids some useless comments. So IMHO, using GitHub reactions is a good thing. Regards, -- Quentin THEURET
Reference
-
Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 11/03/2016 10:13:21 - 0-
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
by Yajo <yajo.sk8@gmail.com> - 22/03/2016 09:28:11 - 0 -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byMoaHub, Graeme Gellatly -
Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
byVauxoo, Moisés López Calderón -
Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?
byNumérigraphe, Lionel Sausin -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp SA, Joël Grand Guillaume -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byAcsone SA/NV, Laurent Mignon -
Re: external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byElico Corp, Eric Caudal -
external review tools (was Re: Should we use the new GitHub reactions?)
byCamptocamp France SAS, Alexandre Fayolle