Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Proposal to add Operating Units to OCAby
Sounds like a very good work.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jordi Ballester Alomar <email@example.com> wrote:
Hi Kitti, we are working on v7, v8, v9.v7 is the most advanced, but not in OCA. Currently we're starting to propose the first modules to OCA on v9, and progressively we'll propose to v8 and then v7.There's already some modules ported to v8 here:As soon as possible we'll be proposing them to OCA. Your review comments will be appreciated on the proposed Pull Requests to OCA:Regards,On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Kitti U. <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I am not sure if the work on OU for v8 is started. I couldn't find the repository for it.
Or you plan to skip and straight to v9?
Thanks.On Dec 1, 2015 9:39 PM, "Jordi Ballester Alomar" <email@example.com> wrote:Dear OCA community,We'd like to propose our work done on Operating Units to be added to OCA.The work is documented here:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iF2tKqCGjpZhTABU4oBT62sM08JFuNBXOtChbOSyBXQ/editThe current repository is here:If there's interest I can schedule a session or two to go through the features functionally.The working version has been 7 so far, but we're starting to port to v8 now.What we'd need to know is how to move the work to OCA.You can find our starting proposal here:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1sacGPz9ofbD0s8Q-jgioFUvvabJD_weqknNzsd2J7X4/edit?usp=sharingYour feedback is much appreciated!--