Contributors mailing list archives
Re: 14.0 branchesby
Acsone SA/NV, Stéphane Bidoul
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 4:11 PM Moises Lopez <email@example.com> wrote:
What about enable 2 builds for 14.0?
Doing both if it's the contributor's responsibility to maintain oca_dependencies.txt and requirements.txt, then I'd say no because it will create additional burden on contributors.
I see two questions here:
1. does MQT_DEP=PIP have issues/warts ?
To the best of my knowledge it does not have functional regressions compared to oca_dependencies.txt and it has several advantages.
It may have some issues. We don't know yet for sure, because it's still young,
Although it has been tested for a few months on several 13.0 repos, only time will tell.
2a. do people rely on the presence of oca_dependencies.txt and requirements.txt in their workflow ?
2b. do we want to guarantee their presence and correctness ?
That is a double open question, to be debated.
I personally would not recommend it.
But if the answer is yes and yes, then we'll need to see what to do.